How to parent without limitations | Trevor Silvester14 days ago
Foisting unnecessary anxieties on to our children can severely restriction their futures, says Trevor Silvester
For 20 years Ive sat in my therapy room and listened to people. Ive heard hundreds of stories from childhood that have led to lives of pain and restriction. Some are what youd expect abuse, trauma and deprivation but many are much more mundane. Can a bad first day at school genuinely lead to a dread of failing? Can a single moment of rejection lead to serial relationship tragedies? It certainly seems so.
Yet for every childhood sufferer of trauma which is continuing bears the scars as an adult, theres an adult for whom trauma contribute to a life of meaning and achievement. Until its sad demise I ran as a therapist with Kids Company, a charity that helped vulnerable young person. As a consequence, Ive often find young people dragging themselves out of a routine of deprivation to pursue a better life with a resilience that left me breathless.
While in my Harley Street practice, I sometimes assure clients whove lived a life of privilege who remain stuck in a gilded prison that only their thinks have created. It doesnt seem to be what happens to us that defines us anywhere near as much, or as often, as the meaning we devote it. If what we induce of life is the result of our interpretations, how can we guide ourselves and our children towards a positive understanding of an event rather than a negative one? How can we select an interpretation that causes us to open up to the world and its potentials rather than shut ourselves off?
If we take one of our cells and set it in a Petri dish with information sources of nutrient, it will move towards the nutrient. If you replace the nutrient with a toxin, the cell will move away. In other words, the cell moves towards an opportunity for growth, or it recognises and responds to a need for protection.
As a collecting of a trillion cells, I suggest we do the same thing. Freud described this as the pleasure principle that we all move towards pleasure and away from pain. From day one on this planet your brain has been interpreting your experiences, using them to predict the way the world runs and what is going to happen to you moment to moment.
Your brain is constantly shuttling backwards into the past to look for relationships between whats happening to you now and what happened before. It then uses the connections it determines to predict what is likely to happen to you next. What this means is that decisions we make as children, whether its about the meanings of our parents screaming at us; or splitting up; or seeming to favour a sibling; or feeling stupid in front of our friends or rejected by them; or humbled by a teacher, any of these can be the beginning of a chain of interpretings or misunderstandings that result us unnecessarily into being in a state of protection. In a world where youre primed for assault, everyone is a possible attacker and menace is contained in every opportunity.
Im not is recommended that our protection response is wrong. It has played a key role in our survival as a species. Wanting to protect “our childrens” is one of the most powerful instincts we have. However, that very strength can cause us to teach our children to fear unnecessarily and even guide them into limiting beliefs about themselves that hold them back their whole life.
What is crucial is to distinguish unnecessary protection from actual threats. Its about how to let go of the limitations you experience and realise that the more you are able to be in growth, the more opportunities youre likely to have to thrive.
Grow! by Trevor Silvester is published by Coronet at 14.99. To order a transcript for 12.74, visit bookshop.theguardian.com
Read more: www.theguardian.com
One Facebook ‘like’ is all it takes to target adverts, academics find24 days ago
Online ad campaigns based on smallest expressions of preference reveal effect of mass psychological persuasion
Online ad campaigns created by academics in Britain and the US have targeted millions of people based on psychological traits perceived from a single “like” on Facebook – demonstrating, they say, the effect of “mass psychological persuasion”.
More than 3.5 million people, mostly women in the UK aged 18-40, were shown online adverts tailored to their personality type after researchers found that specific Facebook likes reflected different psychological characteristics.
The bespoke campaigns boosted clicks on ads for beauty products and gaming apps by up to 40% and sales by as much as 50% compared with untargeted adverts, according to the researchers, who did not benefit financially from the campaigns.
The work, carried out for unnamed companies, was designed to reveal how even the smallest expressions of preference online can be used to influence people’s behaviour.
“We wanted to provide some scientific evidence that psychological targeting works, to show policymakers that it works, to show people on the street that it works, and say this is what we can do simply by looking at your Facebook likes. This is the way we can influence behaviour,” said Sandra Matz, a computational social scientist at Columbia Business School in New York City.
“We used one single Facebook like per person to decide whether they were introverted or extroverted, and that was the minimum amount of information we can possibly use to make inferences about people’s personalities. And yet we still see these effects on how often people click on ads and how often people buy something,” she added.
The work has raised concerns among some in academia. Gillian Bolsover, who studies online manipulation of political opinion at the Oxford Internet Institute, said she was concerned about whose hands publicity of the research might play into.
“Does coverage of the work primarily serve as an advert to the companies that might do these things? Or does it serve to inform the public about something going on in our society that we might not be happy with and want do something about?” she said.
“If people are worried about the way technology is going, there are lots of little actions they can take to reduce the amount of data that is collected about them and to avoid supporting the practices and companies that they might feel are detrimental to society.”
Matz teamed up with researchers at the University of Cambridge who had previously created a database of millions of personality profiles of anonymous Facebook users and items they had liked. The data reveals how, on average, specific likes reflect certain personality types. For example, a like on Lady Gaga’s Facebook page is broadly the mark of an extrovert, while a like on Stargate’s page flags users who are more likely to be introverts.
The researchers then used graphics designers to create adverts aimed at either extroverts or introverts. They showed these via Facebook’s advertising platform to people who had liked a single item identifying them as one personality type or the other.
The first field experiment targeted more than 3 million UK women aged 18-40 with adverts for an online beauty retailer. More than 10,000 women clicked on the ads, leading to 390 purchases. Matching the ads to people’s personalities led to 54% more sales than mismatching them. Two further campaigns for a crossword app and a shooting game had similar results, the researchers report in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“I was surprised that we got the effect with so little information,” said Matz. “We don’t know that much about people, and yet it still has a pretty big effect. You can imagine if you were using the full Facebook profile to make individual level predictions about people’s personalities, the effects would be even bigger.”
Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.
Matz believes that such mass persuasion could be put to great use – for example, by helping people to save, get a pension, or lead more healthy lives. But it could also be misused, she said. “It has the potential for abuse where you exploit weaknesses in a person’s character to make them do things they don’t want to do. We want policymakers to focus on the positive uses. If you just shut down this technology, you would lose so much potential for helping people.”
But the approach is controversial. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office is investigating whether voters were unfairly influenced online by political campaigners in the run-up to the EU referendum in 2016. The ICO’s report is expected before the end of the year.
“In a sense, it’s a natural extension of capitalism as it moves online. Of course corporations will do this,” said Bolsover. “But the increased use of corporate advertising techniques in the political system is something I think we should be worried about on a broader level.”
“Political campaigns [are] probably somewhere you don’t want it to be used,” said Matz. “We want to open it up for public discussion so people can have an informed discussion about what we want to do with our technology.”
Read more: www.theguardian.com
This Community Is Advocating for Air Quality—With Science26 days ago
Kamita Gray and her mom have spent a lot of time volunteering at Brandywine Elementary School, helping kindergarteners learn to write their names and making sure everyone has a turkey on Thanksgiving and Christmas. Every time they’re at the Maryland school, they’re struck by the heavy black smoke from diesel trucks roaring by, en route from construction sites or delivering mining waste to dumps.
Within a 15 mile radius of the predominantly African-American community of Brandywine, you can go on a grand tour of environmental hazards, seeing everything from a sludge lagoon to a coal waste site. By 2019, when two new plants start running, Brandywine will have three large fossil fuel power plants within 2.9 miles—clustered right by the elementary school. Nowhere else in Maryland has as many.
Because Brandywine is an unincorporated community, there’s no mayor or town council to advocate for it. The county representative didn’t show up to the power plant hearings between 2013 and 2015. The plant approval process in Maryland doesn't require air quality data to be collected before construction—and the closest functioning air quality station is 30 miles away. So Brandywine’s residents have never been able to compare air quality data before and after a new industrial site was built to see if things had gotten worse. As the new plants were approved, Gray, in her role as president of the Brandywine TB Neighborhood Coalition, was left to worry over how the heavy industrial pollution would affect local health.
In October 2016, though, Gray caught a break. She was in Washington, DC, giving a presentation about Brandywine’s problems at a conference about vulnerable communities, when her talk captured the attention of Melissa Goodwin, a project manager with Thriving Earth Exchange, a non-profit founded in 2012 that matches communities with scientists to solve local issues. Goodwin introduced Gray to Akua Asa-Awuku, an air quality expert who had just settled in at the University of Maryland. And for the past year, Gray and Asa-Awuku have been working to address one of the biggest roadblocks in Brandywine—the lack of data on its air quality.
With Asa-Awuku’s help, Gray and the BTB Coalition want to collect their own data. They hope it can convince the state of Maryland that Brandywine needs a comprehensive environmental health assessment, and possibly a moratorium on all new industrial projects. But the path forwards is difficult. “Unless the data is collected in a scientifically rigorous way, neither the state nor the EPA will consider [it],” says Gray. Air quality monitors that meet federal regulations cost $100,000, and so far, none of Asa-Awuku’s requested applications for grant money have been awarded. If nothing comes through, she plans to enlist the use of the two air quality monitors already present in her lab. They could then sample the air pollution in Brandywine for two years—long enough to get measurements before and after the power plants start operations.
Brandywine’s predicament also drew in Sacoby Wilson, a public health expert at the University of Maryland. He’s been doing community-engaged work since before TEX was founded, and he and Asa-Awuku are now collaborating on some aspects of helping Brandywine. Last year, he drove to Brandywine three times, with undergraduate and graduate students in tow, to do a short air quality sampling campaign. They tested both the parking lot of the elementary school and a playground, using $260 sensors that Wilson had purchased through small university grants and that are light enough to be worn on a string around your neck.
This is exactly the sort of data that neither the EPA nor the Maryland Department of Environment will consider for actual regulatory action; but it is data that Brandywine residents can be trained to collect and act on themselves. “We want to make the community self-sufficient when it comes to figuring out what sensors to use, what chemicals to look at, where to map,” says Wilson. Because the sensors are cheaper, Brandywine would be able to afford more of their own, and make a map of how air quality changes between a roadway, a house, or a landfill. Then they could schedule outdoor activities like exercise for when air quality is best.
In February, Gray, Wilson, and Asa-Awuku started holding Brandywine community forums. “We left on kind of a high” after the first meeting, says Asa-Awuku, having explained the various health effects of air pollutants like particulate matter and lead. Some parents hadn’t realized that toxins in the air are linked to respiratory problems, especially in children, and started sharing stories of asthma and bronchitis in their toddlers. Wilson talked about environmental justice—the ways in which communities of color are often burdened with the environmental impacts of local industrial sites.
Not all TEX programs have succeeded. Six projects fell apart early on, sometimes because the partner community was overwhelmed by other responsibilities. But still, TEX projects have sprung up from Eugene, Oregon, to rural Kentucky, and new ones are coming online. Working with a core staff of four, TEX has launched over 80 projects since 2012, 35 of which have been completed.
TEX or no TEX, a crucial piece is still missing from grassroots community-science partnerships: funding. In Brandywine, there’s no money to buy air quality monitors, or to create educational materials for the community forums. Wilson points out that public health specialists and social scientists have been doing community-engaged work for decades, much of it under-funded. TEX doesn’t change that. “Academia incentivizes the science of inquiry, not the science of engagement,” he says. “We have to change academia so that community-engaged research is valued more than it currently is.”
More Great WIRED Stories
- Sex, beer, and coding: Inside Facebook’s wild, early days
- Sci-fi invades Netflix—as they both invade your home
- The worst cybersecurity hacks of 2018 so far
- Microsoft’s big bet on a tiny-computer future
- How Silicon Valley fuels an informal caste system
- Looking for more? Sign up for our daily newsletter and never miss our latest and greatest stories
Human expertise: it’s not what you know, it’s who …1 month, 8 days ago
Sharing knowledge is a form of playing, say Steven Sloman and Philip Fernbach. And it depends heavily on others
Most things are complicated even things that seem simple. You wouldnt be shocked to learn that modern automobiles or computers or air traffic control systems are complicated. But what about, say, lavatories?
If you take a minute and try to explain what happens when you flush one, do you even know the general principle that governs its operation? It turns out that most people dont. Nobody could be a master of every facet of even a single thing. Even the simplest objects involve complex webs of knowledge to manufacture and use. Most people cant tell you how a coffee maker works, or how glue holds paper together, let alone something as complex as love.
Our point is not that people are ignorant. Its that people are more ignorant than they think they are. We all suffer, to a greater or lesser extent, from an illusion of understanding, an illusion that we understand how things work when, in fact, our understanding is meagre.
We all have domains in which we are experts, in which we know a lot in exquisite detail. But on most subjects we connect only abstract bits of information, and what we know is little more than a feeling of understanding we cant genuinely unpack.
So how can we get about, audio knowledgeable and take ourselves seriously while understanding only a small fraction of what there is to know?
The answer is that we do so by living a lie. We tell ourselves that we understand whats going on, that our opinions are justified by our knowledge and that our actions are grounded in justified faiths, even though they are not. We tolerate intricacy by failing to recognise it. Thats the illusion of understanding.
So how can humanity achieve so much when people are so ignorant? It turns out we have been very successful at dividing up our cognitive labor. We would not be such competent thinkers if we had to rely only on the limited knowledge stored in our heads and our facility for causal reasoning. The secret to our success is that we live in a world in which knowledge is all around us.
We have access to huge amounts of knowledge that sit in other peoples heads: we have experts that we are going to be able contact to, say, fix our dishwasher when it breaks down for the umpteenth period. We have professors and talking heads to inform us about events and how things work. We have books, and we have the richest source of information of all time at our fingertips, the internet.
But sharing the competences and knowledge is more sophisticated than it voices. Human beings dont merely construct individual contributions to a project, like machines operating in an assembly line. Rather, we are able to work together, well informed others and what they are trying to accomplish. We pay attention together and we share aims. In the language of cognitive science, we share intentionality. This is a form of collaboration that you dont see in other animals. We actually enjoy sharing our mind space with others. In one kind, its called playing.
The nature of thought is to draw on knowledge wherever it can be found, inside and outside our own heads. But we live under the knowledge illusion because we fail to draw an accurate line between what is inside and outside our heads. And we fail because there is no sharp line. So we dont know what we dont know. What we need is a greater appreciation of how much of our own knowledge varies depending on the things and people around us. What goes on between our ears is extraordinary, but it ultimately varies depending on what goes on elsewhere.
The Knowledge Illusion by Steven Sloman and Philip Fernbach( Macmillan, 18.99) is out now. Buy it for 16.14 at bookshop.theguardian.com
Read more: www.theguardian.com
The Engineering Guy Explains the Simple Elegance of this Nerf Gun Design1 month, 18 days ago
Bill ‘The Engineering Guy‘ Hammack of the University of Illinois, explains the simple and elegant design of this Nerf gun firing mechanism.
Bill is a fantastic educator, be sure to check out his channel for more engineering awesomeness.
Air Force Scientist Spilled No Secrets. He Still Went to Prison.2 months, 1 day ago
It takes a good while for J. Reece Roth to answer the door at his home on the west side of Knoxville. A former electrical engineering prof at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, where he was also the director of the Plasma Sciences Laboratory, Roth will be 81 in September and has hip, knee, and heart problems, which have slackened him down quite a bit.
Of course, the four years he spent in prison for violating the Arms Export Control Act didn’t do him many favors, either.
Former students and contemporaries describe Roth as something of a pioneer in the field of plasma physics. When he was accused in 2006 of divulging sensitive technological data to two foreign nationals, Roth had been working on research for the U.S. Us air force, developing thrusters that used atmospheric plasma gas–something typically created only under highly controlled laboratory conditions–to improve the flight performance of unmanned aerial vehicles, or dronings. It’s been almost 15 years, but Roth is still noticeably upset about the style things went down.
” I was handled by the government in a way that has basically intimidated researchers all over the country as far as carrying forward applications[ of my technology ],” he says.
The twist is , none of what Roth disclosed was classified. And the foreign nationals weren’t spies, the latter are grad students. But as is typical with sensitive DoD research, foreign citizens were explicitly forbidden from working on the project without a special license from the federal government. By allowing Ph.D. candidates Xin Dai, from China, and Sirous Nourgostar, from Iran, to participate, Roth violated a once-obscure corner of U.S. exportation law that considers describing, demonstrating, or explaining certain things to a foreign citizen, even one that’s standing next to you in Tennessee, to be an illegal “export.”
Another of Roth’s violations resulted from a trip-up he took to China with a laptop containing files from the Air Force project, even though forensic exams afterward indicated those files were never opened while he was there. During that same trip-up, he asked a student to email him some files. Roth said he was having trouble connecting to the internet, and told the student to send them to the account of a Chinese professor at the university he was visiting.
After six hours of deliberation, the jury convicted Roth on 18 out of 18 countings, including conspiracy, wire hoax, and exporting defense articles and services without a license. The two foreign graduate students were never accused of wrongdoing , nor were they ever suspected of any.
As a former associate of Roth’s told The Daily Beast:” It’s simple. Because this was a military contract, it was a contractual designation[ to restrict participation to U.S. citizens only] and that’s what bolt everything into the ground. Because even a blank sheet of paper from that research was export-controlled .”
American counterintelligence officials have long advised about snoops on campus, and according to recent congressional witnes by current and former U.S. counterintelligence officials, foreign intelligence services are more active than ever within the academic community. There is a ” small but significant percentage” of international students and faculty sent to the U.S. to steal military and civilian research, as journalist and author Daniel Golden testified before the House Science Committee in April, citing a DoD finding that the use of academics by foreign intelligence agencies has tripled over the past two decades.
” Without going into details that I cannot divulge, I can reinforce the fact it is a longstanding issue ,” retired CIA operations officer Charles Goslin told The Daily Beast.” Typically, universities get full compensation from the governments sending those students to the U.S. to analyze and then return with cutting edge the investigations and IP. So, the incentive to keep the cash coming in outweighs the incentive to follow closely the students from those countries .”
As the Trump administration threatens to impose what could turn out to be the most prohibitive restrictions on foreign students’ access to U.S. universities in modern history, exclusive new interviews with figures from the Roth case shed additional light on just how serious the government is about keeping American defense technology out of the incorrect hands.
Roth was born in 1938 in Chartiers, Pennsylvania, near Pittsburgh. He got his bachelor’s at MIT before going on to Cornell for his doctorate. Roth then ran at NASA until 1978, when he left to teach at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Formal and a bit stiff, yet quite friendly and accessible, Roth speaks in a rich baritone and chooses his terms carefully.
Although he rarely gets away much anymore, Roth traveled to China extensively in years past. Two of his books had been translated into Chinese, and he always got a steady river of an applicant for students there who were eager to study with him. Roth speaks extremely highly of the Chinese scientists he has fulfilled, and was made an honorary professor at the renowned University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in Chengdu and Beijing’s elite Tsinghua University in 1992 and 2006.
China is as much of an espionage menace, if not even more so, than Russia, a former intelligence operative from countries around the world in Eastern Europe told The Daily Beast.
” They are extremely effective in using their former citizens, or Americans with Chinese roots or relatives in China ,” the ex-spy said.” They have no limits with fund, and the Chinese government can guarantee resettlement to China and financial support if the person or persons they recruited is captured or busted by local authorities. And of course, “there dont” extradition from China .”
The Chinese government has also established Confucius Institutes, which trace a direct link to China’s Communist Party, at more than 100 universities across the U.S. counterintelligence officials have warned that the Confucius Institutes can be used for espionage, and as former intelligence analyst Peter Mattis recently told The Washington Post , they are part and parcel of the Chinese Communist Party’s ” united front work ” propaganda endeavours against the party’s detractors.
In fact, Chinese influence is of such fear to U.S. counterintelligence officials, they reportedly warned Donald Trump son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner last year that Wendi Deng Murdoch, ex-wife of News Corp CEO and founder Rupert Murdoch, could be working for China’s intelligence services.
Surely is conscious that Chinese espionage does exist, Roth insists the intentions of his Chinese equivalents, by and large, were pure.
” The contacts I had were normal scholarly the relations with colleagues at universities in other countries who simply wanted to exchange information ,” Roth told The Daily Beast in his first interview since being released from prison in 2015.” With the possible exception of my trips to China, the information transfer was pretty much two-way and I don’t think it was motivated by any said he wished to spy on, or take, U.S. technology .”
Needless to say, people targeted by foreign intelligence sometimes don’t know that they’ve been compromised. And spies often don’t was like “spies.” In the post-Roth epoch at UT, the administration advises students and faculty working on export-controlled projects not to even send documents to campus transcript centres where foreign nationals might be working.
Universities have a challenge in blending a culture of academic liberty with restrictions on intellectual property, said Will Mackie, one of the two government attorneys who prosecuted Roth. Mackie emphasizes the importance of academic research to the U.S. economy, and says exportation control laws are not meant to restrict research, but to protect it.
Roth’s situation” was totally preventable ,” his onetime attorney explained.” He never stated that he was totally ignorant of the rules, so that was not a defense … The idea is that he thought that these rules were unnecessary and he also tried to say that he knew this technology better than the regulators and it was something that he didn’t think should be controlled .”
Roth had a route about him that didn’t build people want to go to bat for him when he was carried into court, others said. Daniel Max Sherman, who analyse under Roth before going on to work alongside him, remembered Roth’s tendency to take credit for everything developed in his lab whether it was his idea or not, generating” numerous instances, even legal consequences, over whether or not he owned a certain piece of intellectual property .”
” Roth had such an attitude that basically he had created something special and great ,” Sherman told The Daily Beast.” He would go to these national meetings and tell people they were stealing his ideas, or that he had already thought of it and if they’d simply read Chapter 7, Section 2 of his book …”
In Roth’s case, authorities had been tracking at the least one of his two foreign-born graduate deputies from virtually the moment he first set foot on American soil.
Born in Tehran in 1976, physicist Sirous Nourgostar had always admired Roth’s work from afar. A alumnu of Tehran’s Alborz High School, which was founded by American missionaries in 1873, Nourgostar arrived in the United States in August 2005 to analyze under Roth’s tutelage. Ultra-hardline Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had taken office a few days earlier, and U.S.-Iranian relations were particularly tense.
Nourgostar told The Daily Beast he was questioned and fingerprinted by immigration officials upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport. Although he had a valid F1 student visa, Nourgostar claims officers threatened to turn him away and send him back to Iran. For reasons he never makes fully clear, Nourgostar was eventually cleared for entry and stimulated his way to Tennessee for the autumn semester.
In the meantime, the FBI paid Roth a visit and requested information about, among other things, the kinds of chemicals and instruments Nourgostar would have access to in his laboratory. A few days after Nourgostar got to township, he says he was also questioned by the FBI. Before they could get started, Nourgostar preemptively assured them that he wasn’t religion or observant. The agents cut him off right away, saying they weren’t allowed to talk about that sort of thing.
Eight months later, while Roth was off lecturing in China, the FBI raided his laboratory. Nourgostar watched a team of armed agents label, photo, and cart away everything from computers to lab notebooks as evidence. He says he had no idea why the FBI was there, and they wouldn’t give him any details.
” I supposed perhaps I did something wrong, I was very scared ,” Nourgostar recalled.” Then the head of the FBI team told me,’ Look, I know who you are. All I can tell you at this moment is that this is not about you .'”
When Roth flew back to the Countries from China a few days later, customs agents in Detroit pulled him out of line and copied the contents of his laptop’s hard drive. Nourgostar said Roth called him before catching his connecting flight home to Tennessee, explaining that he had been stopped and questioned. He asked how things were back at the lab, and Nourgostar broke the news to him that the FBI had confiscated most of its contents.
When Roth’s connecting flight landed in Knoxville, agents from the FBI, Customs& Border Protection, and the Department of Commerce seized the laptop itself and a thumb drive. After a two-hour interrogation, Roth said he was allowed to go home; he was not apprehended at that time.
Months went by while the FBI interviewed everyone in Roth’s orbit. According to an as-yet unpublished memoir by Daniel Max Sherman, a friend of his who worked at the Pentagon sent an email promoting him to try not to worry too much.
” It’s uncomfortable, but you did nothing wrong; Roth did … The authorities will figure it out. Regrettably, it will cause you some distress for a period of time and your work will be on a watch list ,” the friend wrote.
Roth wound down whatever research he had left, reviewing newspapers for scientific journals, and getting ready to retire. He vowed to battle and beat this thing. But Nourgostar had been called to testify before a grand jury and knew that Roth was actually in very deep shit.
” I wasn’t supposed to talk or give any feedback about participating in the grand jury, so I could not tell him anything ,” Nourgostar said.” The route he was talking to us, that they don’t have anything, well, all of a sudden there was an indictment .”
Roth was given a day and date to turn himself at the FBI’s Knoxville Field Office to be formally apprehended. Roth was handcuffed and fingerprinted; agents took a Dna sample.
” It was more like an office appointment with a physician than anything else ,” Roth said.” I demonstrated up at the stated place and period; there weren’t any sirens, I wasn’t dragged out of my house or anything like that .”
Nourgostar claims the FBI told him during questioning that they viewed this case as one that would send a” strong message to other universities that we are serious about this kind of thing .”
The drone project” from the beginning had a component in it that I knew, something was not right ,” Nourgostar said,” but at the time, I was a fresh student ,” and felt that it would be better to not make any waves.
Nourgostar wound up taking the stand against Roth, calls his former mentor” an amazing prof I had in my life ,” and described his short stint in Roth’s lab largely as” an exceptional experience .”
” He was a true true educator who wanted to have some sort of legacy left behind ,” said Nourgostar.” I haven’t been able to find anyone else like that man .”
Nourgostar and others describe Roth as somewhat stunted emotionally, possessing virtually childlike social skills.
He set himself at a disadvantage from the beginning, antagonizing the feds from the very beginning of the investigation, according to defense attorney Thomas Dundon, who represented Roth in court and received permission from Roth to speak openly to The Daily Beast about the lawsuit.
Immediately after he was stopped at the airport, but before “hes having” hired Dundon, Roth began calling and emailing federal examiners to defend his position. That is, that academic researchers should be able to use the best and the brightest students as they wish , no matter where they’re from. The investigation would continue for the next three years.
” We started off with Dr. Roth having presented his perspective in the matter more than one time, and in writing on at the least one occasion, to a variety of people ,” said Dundon, explaining the enormity of the task he faced after Roth retained him.” I would not recommend any client do that .”
Roth, who said he had in fact submitted debriefing reports to the CIA after past trip-ups to China, was personally outraged by the insinuation that he couldn’t be trusted to safeguard the integrity of his research, Dundon recollected. Use foreign nationals on a restricted military contract was bad, but Roth taking sensitive information on his laptop to China and having restricted material sent to him via email there was what really stuck in the government’s craw, said Dundon.
Roth absence a full understanding of the internet, and didn’t appreciate the fact that his data could have been intercepted by the Chinese government, something we now know is standard operating procedure, Dundon said. Whether or not Chinese agents or any of Roth’s Chinese university colleagues actually got access to this material, Dundon doesn’t know.
” I don’t recall there being any proof, but I do recall that the government expressed concern about that ,” he said.
” I admired Dr. Roth for being willing to stand up for his principles ,” Dundon said.” I don’t see that very often in my business. A plenty of people would perhaps “say its” misplaced. Nevertheless, there are a few people willing to danger prison for their principles. He’s one of them .”
Daniel Max Sherman was a student of Roth’s at UT before going into business with him. Now 47 and living in Chattanooga, Sherman exudes an unmistakable cynicism about the world.
Born in rural Dayton, Tennessee, to a mommy who had turned 18 only a few days earlier, Sherman never fulfilled “his fathers”. He got his contact info a while back, but never actually got in touch.
” I grew up with a long list of stepfathers, almost all cases with military backgrounds ,” Sherman explained.” The first father I remember was a drill sergeant for the Army and he was not a nice man .”
Sherman, who is speaking publicly about the occurrence for the first time, left home during his senior year of high school, primarily to escape his mother’s third spouse, an alcoholic Marine Corps drill instructor. Sherman’s grandmother managed to cobble together enough fund for him to attend UT, and one of his high school teachers devoted him a few hundred bucks for textbooks.
Sherman was the director of plasma sciences at a small, publicly traded company in Knoxville called Atmospheric Glow Technologies( AGT ). Roth was a minority partner. Located in a commercial park 20 minutes west of downtown Knoxville, the offices are less than a 10 -minute drive from Reece Roth’s home.
AGT was spun off from UT to develop commercial applications for Roth’s plasma actuator design. In fact, Sherman, who co-owns the patent, says the actuator” in this particular form was a design that resulted during my Master’s in 1995. At that time, Dr. Roth was my advisor .” Roth reportedly offered to let Sherman take full credit, but Sherman, Roth, and a third collaborator are listed as co-inventors.
AGT existed with two basic fund mechanisms, Sherman explained. One followed the traditional commercial model, creating money from outside investors. The other came from the federal government. Sherman was the one who wrote the bulk of those proposals, making most of the initial ideas after which he said other people’s names would unavoidably also be” slapped on .”
Still, the issues to remains: Why would Roth risk his reputation, his career, and his freedom only to hire a couple of foreign alumnu research deputies? Is it truly that hard to find competent American Ph.D. nominees?
” Dr. Roth’s lab was constantly filled with foreign nationals ,” said Sherman.” His book had been translated into foreign languages and they respected him and most Americans couldn’t stand working for him, he was such an ass .”
Dan Golden, author of Spy Schools: How the CIA, FBI, and Foreign Intelligence Secretly Exploit America’s Universities , was the first person to interview Roth when he went to prison in 2012 and has written about the suit extensively.
” I think it flattered his vanity to have students who had admired him from afar and who could remind him about what a major figure “hes in” China, because he’s not a man without ego ,” Golden told The Daily Beast.” So, that’s the specific reason. More broadly, there’s a plethora of foreign graduate student in American science departments .”( He also points out the ironic disconnect between UT’s vigilance in turning in Roth while at the same time seeming less alert to the myriad issues posed by hosting a Confucius Institute on campus .)
It was Sherman who ultimately acquiesced to Roth’s demand that Xin Dai, his Chinese student, be hired onto the drone project. However, he insisted that all limited material be kept away from Dai and handled by an American student, Truman Bonds. A noble theory, but one that unfortunately did not work in practice, according to Sherman.
As Dai neared graduation and Roth announced that he wanted Nourgostar to take his place, Sherman finally set his foot down.
” It had been made clear to me that it truly wouldn’t be a good idea ,” said Sherman.” As one of[ my former colleagues] at Oak Ridge[ National Laboratory] explained to me,’ Daniel, I can’t send this pen to Iran .'”
When Sherman told Roth he would do whatever it took to block the hire, Roth sought support from the university’s supervisor of faculty research contracts. She advised Roth to speak to the school’s newly-hired exportation control policeman, who was more than a little alarmed not only by the notion of hiring an Iranian national for a project that was very obviously subject to serious regulations, but also that a Chinese national had previously been spent a year illegally working on the project without anyone knowing it. Roth left for China, the export control policeman called authorities, and that’s when everything began to collapse.
According to most everyone involved, Roth dismissed multiple warns from various people about his hiring of foreign students, insisting all the while that the university’s non-discrimination policy overrode federal exportation law.
During the trial, Roth flatly refused to consider negotiating a plea bargain, insisting he had done nothing incorrect. The jury plainly believed otherwise, finding that Roth acted with the requisite intent.
Backed into a corner, Sherman agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Arms Export Control Act. The magistrate sentenced him to 14 months. He did his time as inmate #32207-074 at a federal prison camp in Florence, Colorado, alongside former Enron CFO Andy Fastow, who worked in the barbershop.
Sherman says he took the deal in hopes that he could” put this shitstorm behind me and try to eventually rebuild a life, which I haven’t .”
” What does a offender do when they get out of incarcerate ?” he says when asked if he still practices physics.” They do building. I do remodeling and building, that pays the majority of my bills .”
Xin Dai got his Ph.D. in electrical engineering in 2006, and now works as a patent lawyer in Palo Alto. He did not respond to multiple requests for remark. Sirous Nourgostar is working as a researcher in the University of Wisconsin Madison’s Department of Nuclear Engineering. Truman Bonds is the president of a firm in Knoxville, which is successfully commercializing a carbon fiber oxidation project Sherman says he started back at Atmospheric Glow. Reached by email, Bonds declined to comment.
Atmospheric Glow was charged as a company, and pleaded guilty to 10 countings of conspiracy. On April 1, 2008, the firm declared bankruptcy. A few months later, AGT’s assets were sold off to a Connecticut firm for $125,000 cash, plus $ 200,000 in stock.
In the end, Sherman fell only short of earning his doctorate. Once the federal investigation began, the Air force stopped communicating with the AGT team. When the Ph.D. committee realized there would be no way for Sherman to publish his results, they told him it wasn’t worth going any further.
” The greatest damage, my friends would say, is that by the time I left prison, I had turned my back on invention ,” Sherman said.” I found a wealthy philanthropist here in town who wanted me to take over a high-tech project kind of as a pastime, and I did that for a little while until he passed away, and I haven’t done science since .”
Both Sherman and Roth speak about their plasma research with noticeable pride, although they both say it has largely disappeared.
” I will tell you that all the inventions that we came up with, to this day are still not being discussed in the public literature ,” said Sherman.” The technology could literally be 100 times more electrically efficient and 10 times stronger, but no one talks about it .”
” The technology in the U.S. has not advanced nearly as quickly and over as broad a scope as I think it should have ,” said Roth, who lists a number of civilian uses that haven’t yet been fully explored, including sterilization and decontamination in the medical and agricultural fields.
” At the time I was jailed, there were a bunch of tests showing that plasma actuators could reduce the drag on[ wind turbine blades] up to 30 percent ,” Roth explained.” In aerodynamic words, that’s a big decrease in drag. Over the last 50 years, they’ve been spending millions to get the drag on airfoils down simply a few percentage at a time .”
On the other hand, Tom McLaughlin of the Air Force Academy says Roth’s technology, which he describes not as a brand-new discovery, but a clever “tool” based on the dielectric hurdle discharge plasma first reported by Ernst Werner von Siemens in 1857, had already reached what he considers to be its practical restrictions, at the least for his purposes.
” It was difficult to make it work at aerodynamic velocities of interest to us ,” McLaughlin told The Daily Beast.” It would at very low velocities but the faster you got, the less effective it became. I don’t think the occurrence led to the demise of the technology, we played out the technology and procured it wasn’t doing everything we thought it would .”
Dan Golden was glad that Dai and Nourgostar have stayed to make lives in America, saying that this is precisely the point that people often overlook when they talk about the danger of espionage at U.S. universities: The great majority of Chinese( and other) students who come to the States and earn their Ph.D.s stay for at the least five years after getting their doctorate. Some stay a lot longer than that, said Golden, entailing their inventions stay here, too.
” If you cut off China, you lose the benefit of all the research they do when they’re here. If we can reduce the espionage and steal done by a small minority, we could get the benefit of the majority, who don’t .”
The experience has obviously left an indelible impression on Roth, whose spouse Helen watches Tv in the other room as he recounts events more than a decade in the past like they happened yesterday.
Today, Roth’s life tends toward the ludditistic. He has a cell phone, but if he wants to set something in writing, he sends a letter. He has refused to get online since leaving prison for fear of” the potential misrepresentation of any kind of message they happen to come up with through these dragnets that they perform on people’s correspondence .”
Roth views his case as having been” politically motivated ,” and doesn’t think investigators had the necessary level of scientific sophistication to fully comprehend the nuances involved. If they had, he doesn’t believe he ever would have been hauled into court in the first place.
” Some of those attorneys were involved in pursuing people who were making bootleg alcohol and that was the kind of prosecution that they seemed to go after ,” Roth says.” I think they attribute China’s technical success to their stealing our technology, when in fact the Chinese are perfectly capable of developing and originating their own .”
Read more: www.thedailybeast.com