The 16 Christmas Memes Till Christmas Event

13 hours ago

Read more:

Screaming, fist-banging and ‘spit on my face’: What it was like to work for Wynn

13 hours ago

Las Vegas( CNN) Steve Wynn slipped a pair of vampire teeth into his mouth and walked into federal employees session at his glittering Las Vegas casino.

It didn’t work.

The 15 merchants he faced inside the Wynn Las Vegas — all fuming over his new policy that greatly reduced take-home pay — would afterward file a complaint against him with the National Labor Relations Board, “says hes” threatened to fire them if they unionized. They told a board judge that the mogul constructed his phase by hurling a tantrum, wailing, belittling them and slamming his fist on a table.

Former cocktail waitress celebrates Wynn resignation

YA Books Are For Everyone

13 hours ago

The Atlantic recently published a thorough expose on the changing definition of adulthood, and how we define it today. The writer spoke with developmental psychologists and quoth a survey of anecdotes to conclude that the once-definable life stage is increasingly nebulous — some report that it begins as soon as financial independence is reached, and others not until raising small children.

To account for the huge range of events and nations of mind now associated with growing up, some psychologists have crafted a new label for that ever-awing period that exists among heading off to college and nesting comfortably in a place that’ll likely remain unchanged for decades: “emerging adulthood.”

According to The Atlantic, “While […] adolescence clearly objective at 18, when people typically leave high school and their parents’ homes, and are legally are recognised as adults, one leaves emerging adulthood … whenever one is ready.”

Whenever one is ready . That adulthood has inevitably become less about checking off certain life markers — a home, a spouse and a gaggle of children — and more about an internal country of feeling responsible for one’s own options, entails defining oneself as grown-up can feel murky.

One anonymous reader noted that as a 56 -year-old married woman with a career and no children, she would describe herself as an adult. But, the status is less a permanent identity marker than a nation achievable when necessary. She likens being grown-up to a fish “glittering in water, ” a slippery thing she can snag in moments when maturity is required.

“You know it’s swimming around there and you can reach out and maybe touch it, but to catch it would destroy everything, ” she writes. “And the moments when you do catch it — when you have to attend a brother-in-law’s funeral or euthanize a paralyzed pet — you grasp it and you do it fully and well but you long to fling it back in the pond, explosion David Bowie, and sit on the grass contentedly, watching adulthood glint in the sunlight.”

It may be useful, then, to offer a new narrative about growing up. It’s a privileged one, to be sure — not everyone has the luxury of maintaining responsibility on a shelf, and socioeconomic factors certainly influence when individuals fully enter adulthood. But for those eschewing matrimony, parenthood, home ownership, and other choices that promote stability rather than spontaneity, maturity can be seen as a skill rather than a lifestyle, a route of treating oneself and others rather than an adherence to a monolithic template.

If many of us could be categorized as emerging adults — people picking and preferring which responsibilities suit our personal faiths — could that help explain why our bookshelves are as likely to house Paper Towns as they are Leaves of Grass ? The tendency of adults reading Young Adult literature has been linked to a sort of mass juvenilization, but when we view YA readers as people dipping their toes back into youthful naivety, a clearer picture emerges.

Although YA books often circumvent the grittier parts of life — “gratuitous” sex and drugs are generally omitted — the experience of reading them can be as squarely adult as blowing the dust off a beloved Bowie record. To reenter a carefree state of mind from the vantage point of a more responsible human is a the ways and means of escaping said responsibilities, but it’s also a means of reflecting, and considering who we were, who we thought we were, who we wanted to be, and, eventually, who we’ve become.

If emerging adulthood is about maintaining a state of flux and freedom while slowly acquiring the responsibilities that matter to us, looking back on our lives’ trajectories can be a meditative act.

This could begin to explain what author Kate Axelrod described on Literary Hub as “the ever-blurring lines across literary genres.” Although her book, The Law of Loving Others , is about a college student coping with her mother’s mental illness, publishers insisted on packaging it as YA due to the protagonist’s age. Disappointed, Axelrod wrote, “To me, all YA suggested was that I had failed, in a few critical style, to captivate an adult audience.”

Of course, this is inaccurate. A 2012 survey showed that over half of YA readers are adults( or, perhaps, emerging adults ). The survey doesn’t include data on whether those readers are picking up titles more suited to their age group in addition to The Faulting in Our Stars , and if they aren’t, the juvenilization objection may be founded. But I’m willing to guess that these readers’ shelves are diverse and that, like their real-life responsibilities, their literary habits waffle between serious, thoughtful , nostalgic, and strictly fun.

Read more:

19 Signs You’re Intelligent Even If It Doesn’t Feel Like It

13 hours ago

Stupid people tend to overestimate their areas of competence, while smart people tend to sell themselves short. As Shakespeare set it in “As You Like It“: “The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.”

That conventional wisdom is backed up by a Cornell University survey conducted by David Dunning and Justin Kruger. The phenomenon is now known as the Dunning-Kruger effect.

So, if you’re not too sure about your own intellect, it actually might be a indication that you’re pretty intelligent thoughtful enough to realize your limitations, at least.

Here are some subtle signs that you are considerably smarter than you think.

1. You took music lessons

Research been shown that music helps kids’ minds develop in a few ways 😛 TAGEND

A 2011 study found that scores on a test of verbal intelligence among 4- to 6-year-olds rose after only a month of music lessons.

A 2004 analyse led by Glenn Schellenberg found that 6-year-olds who took nine months of keyboard or voice lessons had an IQ boost compared with kids who took drama lessons or no class at all.

Meanwhile, a 2013 examine, also led by Schellenberg, suggested that high-achieving children were the ones most likely to take music lessons. In other words, in the real world, musical train may only enhance cognitive differences that already exist.

2. You’re the oldest

Oldest siblings are usually smarter, but it’s not because of genetics, one study found.

Norwegian epidemiologists utilized military records to examine the birth order, health status, and IQ ratings of virtually 250,000 18 – and 19 -year-old humen born between 1967 and 1976. Outcomes showed that the average firstborn had an IQ of 103, compared to 100 for second children and 99 for third children.

The New York Times reports: “The new findings, from a landmark analyse published[ in June 2007 ], showed that eldest children had a slight but significant edge in IQ an average of three points over the closest sibling. And it found that the difference was not because of biological factors but the psychological interplay of parents and children.”

For this and other reasons, firstborns tend to be more successful( but not that much more successful )~ ATAGEND than their siblings.

3. You’re thin

For a 2006 study, scientists gave roughly 2,200 adults intelligence test over a five-year period and results suggested that the bigger the waistline, the lower the cognitive ability.

Another study published that same year found that 11 -year-olds who scored lower on verbal and nonverbal tests were more likely to be obese in their 40 s. The analyze writers say that smarter kids might have sought better educational opportunities, landed higher-status and higher-paying undertakings, and therefore ended up in a better position to take care of their own health than their less intelligent peers.

Meanwhile, a more recent analyze found that, among preschoolers, a lower IQ was linked to a higher BMI. Those researchers also say environmental factors are at play, since the relationship between BMI and smarts was mediated by socioeconomic status.

4. You have a cat

A 2014 analyze of 600 college student found that individuals who identified as “dog people” were more outgoing than those who identified as “cat people, ” according to a test that measures personality and intelligence.

But guess what? Those same cat people scored higher on the part of the test that measures cognitive ability .

5. You were breastfed

2007 research suggests that babies who are breastfed might grow up to be smarter kids.

In two studies, the researchers looked at more than 3,000 children in Britain and New Zealand. Those children who had been breastfed scored virtually seven phases higher on an IQ test but only if they had a particular version of the FADS2 gene.( That version of the gene was present in roughly equal numbers among kids who were and weren’t breastfed .)

Figuring out the exact mechanism of this relationship between FADS2, breastfeeding, and IQ will require further study, the scientists noted in their paper on the finding.

6. You’ve employed recreational drugs

A 2012 examine of more than 6,000 Brits born in 1958 find a is connected with high IQ in childhood and the use of illegal drugs in adulthood.

“In our large population-based cohort examine, IQ at 11 years was associated with a greater likelihood of using selected illegal drugs 31 years later, ” wrote researchers James W. White, Catharine R. Gale, and David Batty.

They conclude that “in contrast to most analyzes on the association between childhood IQ and later health, ” their findings suggest “a high childhood IQ may inspire the adoption of behaviours that are potentially harmful to health( i.e ., excess alcohol consumption and drug use) in adulthood.”

7. You’re lefthanded

Left-handedness used to be associated with criminality, and researchers are still unclear as to whether and why there are slightly more lefties among criminal populations.

More recent research associates left-handedness with “divergent thinking, ” a form of creativity that allows you to come up with novel ideas from a prompt at least among men.

In her review of a 1995 newspaper, New Yorker reporter Maria Konnikova writes 😛 TAGEND

The more marked the left-handed predilection in a group of males, the better they were at exams of diverging thought.

Left-handers were more adept, for example, at combining two common objects in novel ways to sort a third for example, employing a pole and a tin can to make a birdhouse. They also excelled at grouping lists of words into as many alternate categories as possible.

8. You’re tall

A 2008 Princeton study of thousands of people found that taller people scored higher on Iq test as kids and earned more money as adults.

The researchers write: “As early as age 3 before schooling has had a chance to play a role and throughout childhood, taller children perform significantly better on cognitive tests.”

9. You drink alcohol regularly

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa and colleagues found that, among Brits as well as Americans, adults who had scored higher on Iq test when they were kids or teens drank more alcohol, more often in adulthood than those who had scored lower.

10. You learned to read early

In 2012, researchers looked at virtually 2,000 pairs of identical twins in the UK and found that the sibling who had learned to read earlier tends to score higher on tests of cognitive ability.

The study authors suggest that reading from an early age increases both verbal and nonverbal( e.g. reasoning) ability, as opposed to the other way around.

11. You fret a lot

A growing body of research suggests that anxious people may be smarter than others in certain ways, according to Slate’s coverage of several different surveys on nervousnes.

In one study, for example, researchers asked 126 undergrads to fill out questionnaires in which they indicated how often they experienced fret. They also indicated how often they engaged in rumination, or guessing continuously about the aspects of situations that upset them, as psychologist Dr. Edward Selby is available in Psychology Today.

Results showed that people who tended to worry and ruminate a lot scored higher on measures of verbal intelligence, while people who didn’t do much worry or ruminating scored higher on tests of nonverbal intelligence.

12. You’re funny

In one study, 400 psychology students took intelligence test that measured abstract reasoning abilities and verbal intelligence.

Then they were asked to come up with captions for several New Yorker cartoons, and those captions were reviewed by independent raters.

As predicted, smarter students were rated as funnier.

13. You’re curious

In University of London business psychology professor Tomas Chamorro-Premuzi’s post for Harvard Business Review, he discussed how the curiosity quotient and having a hungry mind makes one more inquisitive.

Regarding the importance of CQ, he wrote that, “It has not been as deeply analyzed as EQ and IQ, but theres some proof to suggest it is just as important when it comes to managing intricacy in two major styles. First, someones with higher CQ are generally more tolerant of ambiguity. This nuanced, sophisticated, subtle reasoning style defines the very essence of complexity. Second, CQ leads to higher levels of intellectual investment and knowledge acquisition over hour, especially in formal domains of education, such as science and art( note: this is of course different from IQs measurement of raw intellectual horsepower ). “

A Goldsmiths University of London examine found that intellectual investment, or “how people invest their time and endeavour in their intellect, ” plays a major part in cognitive growth.

14. You’re messy

A study published in “Psychological Science” by the University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management’s Dr. Kathleen Vohs revealed that working in an untidy room actually fuels creativity.

In the study, 48 participants were asked to come up with unusual uses for a pingpong ball. The 24 people working in neat rooms came up with substantially less creative responses than the individuals working in cluttered rooms.

So if you are a pack rat, tell everyone you’re just fueling your sense of creativity and innovation the next time person tells you to clean up your act.

15. You didn’t have sex until after high school

High schoolers with higher IQs are more likely to be virgins than those with average or lower IQs, according to a study from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. The core sample looked at 12,000 teens from the 7th to the 12 th grade.

Not merely were the teens with the higher IQs more likely to be virgins, they were also least likely to kiss or hold hands with a romantic partner. A number of justifications have been put forward by the science blog Gene Expression to explain this gap, including suggestions that smart people possess lower sex drives, are risk adverse, or simply less able to find sexual partners.

16. You’re a night owl

One analyse published in the “The Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences” found that, when all other variables are factored out, night owls tend to beat out early birds to its implementation of intellect. It concluded that ethnographic proof indicates that “nocturnal activities” were rarer in the ancestral surrounding. That means that more intelligent someones are more likely to stay up late because smarter people are more likely to “espouse evolutionarily novel values.”

17. You don’t always have to try hard

This isn’t to say that laziness is a sign of being smart. But it is fair to say that smart people simply don’t always “re trying” as hard as “strivers” who fight designed to strengthen their skills at least in certain fields.In an sentiments piece for The New York Times, psychologists David Z. Hambrick and Elizabeth J. Meinz quoth a Vanderbilt University study of very intelligent young people.

The study tracked 2,000 people who scored in the top 1% of the SAT by the age of 13. Hambrick and Meinz wrote that, “The remarkable finding of their study is that, compared with the participants who were only in the 99.1 percentile for intellectual ability at age 12, those who were in the 99.9 percentile the profoundly gifted were between three and five times more likely to go on to earn a doctorate, procure a patent, publish an article in a scientific periodical or publish a literary work. A high level of intellectual ability gives you an enormous real-world advantage.”

They concluded that while striving to be smarter is commendable, there are certain innate abilities that can’t always be learned.

18. You don’t constantly need to be around people

We tend to be happier when we spend more time with friends.

That is, except for the hyper-intelligent people among us. As Business Insider previously reported, a Singapore Management University and London School of Economics study found that smart people differ from the rest of us when it comes to happiness levels and socialization.

So if you adore your friends but require a solid chunk of “me time” too, that could be a sign that you’re super smart.

19. You live in a ‘walkable’ city

As it turns out, geography could be a pretty good indicator of how smart you are. As Chris Weller wrote for Tech Insider, Smart Growth America’s study found that cities built for pedestrians tend to attract more college grads than cities built for vehicles. Washington DC scored highest in education and second in walkability, while New York City was voted “the most walkable metro area” in the US.

Drake Baer and Chelsea Harvey contributed to a previous version of this article .

Read the original article on Tech Insider. Copyright 2016.

Now watch: This sentient garden can roll to the perfect location

Read more:

Imagine there’s no Sgt Pepper. It’s all too easy in the era of Trump and May | John Harris

13 hours ago

This great Beatles album is as thrilling a listen as ever on its 50 th anniversary: but its a melancholy day for the one-world counterculture the record soundtracked

At the time Sgt Pepper was released, the American writer Langdon Winner once recalled, I happened to be driving across the country on Interstate 80. In each city where I stopped for gas or food Laramie, Ogallala, Moline, South Bend the tunes wafted in from some far-off transistor radio or portable hi-fi For a brief while, the irreparably fragmented consciousness of the west was unified, at the least in the minds of the young.

How far away it all seems. On 26 May the 50th anniversary of the Beatles Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band( it actually falls on 1 June) is likely to be marked by the release of remixed and repackaged versions of the original album. With his characteristically jolly meeknes, Paul McCartney insists in the latest issue of Mojo magazine that its only a record but its gained in notoriety over the years. The truth is that Sgt Pepper might be the most confident, boundary-pushing record British rock musicians had already been generated, and it is worth revisiting again.

We might also think about the era the album crystallised, and its long legacy. Sgt Pepper is not quite the quintessentially psychedelic, love-and-peace artefact of historical cliche: streaked through its multicoloured astonish is a very Beatle-ish various kinds of melancholy, partly rooted in the bands decidedly unpsychedelic postwar childhoods. But the wider culture moment, and the Beatles place at its heart, were indeed replete with beads, buzzers and a wide-eyed optimism.

Three weeks after the album came out, the band were the biggest attraction in the worlds first global satellite TV demonstrate, singing All You Need Is Love to an audience of as many as 350 million. Meanwhile, on both the US west coast and in swinging London, young people on the cutting edge genuinely were trying to push into a future very different from the one their parents had envisaged.

The so-called counterculture may not initially have reached much beyond its urban nerve centres and campuses. But the basic ideas Sgt Pepper soundtracked soon acquired enough influence to begin no end of social revolutions. A new emphasis on self-expression was manifested in the decisive arrival of feminism and gay liberation. Countries and borders came a distant second to the idea of one world.

Such shibboleths as matrimony until death and a job for life were quickly weakened. Once the leftist unrest of 1968 was out of the way, the shift continued away from the old-fashioned politics of systems and social structures towards the idea of freeing ones mind everything coloured with an essentially optimistic position of the future.

Two years after Sgt Peppers release, a young alumnu at Wellesley College, a women-only institution in Massachusetts, dedicated a speech. Our persisting acquisitive and competitive corporate life, including tragically the universities, is not the way of life for us, she said. Were searching for more immediate, ecstatic, and penetrating modes of living. And so our topics, our questions about our institutions, about our colleges, about our churches, about our government continue.

Her name was Hillary Rodham, and her journey says a lot about where 1960 s values eventually resulted us. To quote the music novelist Charles Shaar Murray, the line from hippy to yuppie was not nearly as convoluted as some people subsequently liked to believe and once the love decades more ambitious alumni reached positions of power, the origin of many of their notions was as clear as day.

Their professed distaste for corporate values fell away, but the hippy individualism summed up in the future Hillary Clintons insistence on immediate and ecstatic ways of life lived on, as did a questioning attitude to tradition, and to the stifling the limit of the old-fashioned nation state.

After the anti-6 0s backlash symbolised by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, by the mid-9 0s such notions were shaping a new political establishment, exemplified by Bill Clinton, and Blair and Browns New Labour. I am a modern man, from the rocknroll generation. The Beatles, colour TV, thats my generation, said Blair. Clinton honked away at his saxophone and ended his rallies with a song by Fleetwood Mac.

It is not hard to read across from these legislators ideals to what they soaked up in their formative years. In 2005 Blair, who fronted a long-haired band while at Oxford University, told the Labour party conference that people should be swift to adapt, slow to complain open, willing and able to change. Collectivity was yesterdays thing; against a background of globalisation and all-enveloping liberalism, governments task was to encourage people to be as flexible and self-questioning as possible.

John Lennons response to the rebels of 68: the Beatles build Revolution rock

Go back 50 years, and you perhaps hear early stirrings of those ideas, soaked in patchouli petroleum and put to tape at EMIs Abbey Road studios. Try George Harrisons Indian-flavoured Within You Without You: Try to realise its all within yourself/ No one else can construct you change . Or what about John Lennons response to the rebels of 68 in Revolution( on the so-called White Album )? You tell me its the institution/ Well, you know/ Youd better free your intellect instead . As for a picture of globalised utopia, after the Beatles had broken up, Lennon released that saccharine anthem Imagine, with its key line: Imagine theres no countries .

And now? If youre a citizen of the world, youre a citizen of nowhere, says our new “ministers “. If we do indeed live in the post-liberal times endlessly analysed in academic papers, it is the inheritance of the 60 s that is in question. For sure, many of the changes that originated then have become irreversibly embedded in millions of lives. Positions to marriage, sexuality and matters such as race are seemingly more liberal than ever; wherever you go, youre never very far from the whiff of marijuana smoke.

But the dominance of post-6 0s individualism and globalisation is being weakened by the resurgence of collective identities meant to have withered away: class, nation, region. And if the events of 2016 and 2017 are anything to go by, political success now often goes to people whose values seem the polar opposite of the old counterculture.

Duty, nationhood, and regular trips to church: whatever values Theresa May affects to represent, they are surely redolent of a world that existed long before the 1960 s( consider also her parliamentary record, which includes votes against equalising the age of permission, lesbian adoption and the repeal of section 28 ).

Last year, a New York Post article contrasted Hillary Clintons embodiment of the campus 1960 s with the sense that Donald Trump was an unexpected throwback to the Rat Pack, those macho exemplars of everything the hippies wanted to sweep away. Trump, said the author, represented pre-Feminist Man, the guy who boasts about never having changed a nappy and expects subservience from his wives.

Sgt Pepper arrived two decades after the second world wars objective: approximately the same historical distance that separates the Brexit/ Trump age from the high point of the Clinton/ Blair era. Devote a 21 st-century polish, the albums music voices as thrilling as ever, though with a bittersweet sense of a credo abruptly falling victim to a counter-revolution.

On the last track of the old side two, the bell-like piano chords that begin A Day in the Life are applied to sound like the death knell of all the inward-looking, fusty, moralistic ideas the Beatles came to do away with. How strange to tune in half a century afterwards and find all that stuff back with a vengeance.

Read more:

Bunch wants to be’ Google Analytics for company culture’

13 hours ago

Bunch, a newly-launched startup operating out of Berlin, is aiming to be something akin to a “Google Analytics for company culture”. It offers a SaaS to let companies and company teams quantify internal company culture, and then employ this data as the basis to screen task candidates to help ensure that they will also be a good fit.

Specifically, by mapping company culture data against that provided by a chore applicant, the idea, Bunch founder and CEO Darja Gutnick tells me, is to be able to highlight any potential culture fit issues that can be taunted out during a subsequent interview. The software itself is based on the “organizational culture diagnosis” model developed by Charles O’Reilly from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University.

Gutnick says that during her day as a researcher and consultant for “high-growth startups”, she realized that a strong company culture is at the core of every successful squad. However, making the right company culture starts with hiring the right people, but it is a challenge for many companies to figure out who really is a fit for their team. Assessing nominees based on a CV and numerous rounds of interviews alone simply doesn’t cut it.

The way Bunch works is as follows: A company signs to the Saas and its teams take a 5-minute culture evaluation, based on the O’Reilly model. Then, employing the data provided, Bunch creates a culture profile for the company and each of its teams, mapped onto 6 key dimensions: Results-orientation, Adaptability, Collaborative, Detail-orientation, Principles and Customer-orientation. Every new applicant is tasked with taking an automated culture quiz that Bunch checks against the team and company profile.

Using the resulting Bunch report, which details the candidate’s “behavioral tendencies” as well their potential fit with the company, the premise is that hiring directors can make more informed decisions but also use any conflicts as a jumping off phase during a subsequent interview to truly drill down into how well they integrate or what cultural value they could in fact add.

For example, someone very detailed oriented and rigid might not seem a fit for a fast-moving super early startup, but actually, within a particular squad and by being aware of and talking through the potential conflict at interview, it could be the exact attribute a squad needs. Or so the thinking goes.

Put differently, Gutnick frames it as changing the focus away from a candidate’s professional past and towards his/ her present state of mind, squad fit and work attitudes that impact present and future performance.

“Team diversity in background, education and demographics is helpful and needed, but when it comes to beliefs and attitudes, alignment is a key success factor resulting in 5x more annual revenue as opposed to companies that are not aligned. By measuring cultural alignment utilising multiple machine learning components, Bunch offer a solution that helps companies select nominees that fit the team, shape their culture early on when hiring and drive its success, ” she says.

Read more:

Compassion is a boomerang.


Share and Enjoy:The post Compassion is a boomerang. appeared first on Indexed.


The Best Veggie Lasagna (Really)


Are you looking for new vegetarian recipes to add to your repertoire? This month, we’ll be featuring delicious vegetarian dinners, starting with this lasagna from A Couple Cooks’ new cookbook, Pretty Simple Cooking.… Read more
The post The Best Veggie Lasagna (Really) appeared first on A Cup of Jo.


A Week of Outfits: Nicole Bruno


As a communications specialist with a Manhattan law firm, Nicole Bruno is always brainstorming cool workwear. “The dress code is business-y for sure,” she says. “Yet I still want to look like myself and feel comfortable.” She has a knack for coming up with professional outfits that have small twists or fun details.… Read more
The post A Week of Outfits: Nicole Bruno appeared first on A Cup of Jo.


Transgender Pastor Is Welcomed Into Church With A New Name